Our event, Uncovering Perpetrators & Atypical Patterns in ‘Honour’-Based Abuse (HBA), brought academics, frontline professionals and students together to challenge the stereotypes surrounding HBA, explore the psychology of “honour” and examine under-researched perpetrator profiles.
The session began with an introduction from Afrah Qassim, founder and CEO of Savera UK, providing background on the reason that the charity was established 15 years ago and how its work has changed and developed over the years.
The partnership with the University of Liverpool was established in 2021, and intended to build on data and develop research. Its intention was to help improve understanding and responses to HBA and harmful practices, and improve interventions and dispel myths and stereotypes. Two papers have been published already, with two currently undergoing review ahead of publication.
Thanking event chair, Professor Louise Almond, for the university’s continuing support, Afrah said: “Our partnership with the University of Liverpool is a powerful one, and it is vitally important that we come together across sectors and locally, nationally and internationally to drive meaningful and impactful change.”
HBA training turns knowledge into action
Savera UK’s Training and Development Manager, Ayesha Alam, began by highlighting the lack of reliable data on the prevalence of HBA and harmful practices as a result of underreporting due to fear of repercussions, mislabelling of HBA incidents that are reported as domestic violence or child abuse, and a lack of statutory definition, meaning that professionals don’t have consistent guidance, causing gaps in protection.
She also addressed stereotypes, such as the misconception that HBA only happens in ‘certain communities’, that perpetrators are always older males and that only women and girls are affected.
Ayesha said: “HBA is much more complex than that. These stereotypes and assumptions are dangerous. The data we have does show that there is higher prevalence in some communities, but anyone can be affected, including men and boys and LGBTQ+ communities, and anyone can be a perpetrator, including women and children.”
Key to addressing stereotypes is research and training, Ayesha continued: “Research helps to challenge assumptions about who commits HBA and harmful practices, where and how it happens, and why it happens. Training is the tool that turns knowledge into action, empowers professionals to recognise non-typical signs of abuse, provide trauma-informed and culturally sensitive support and avoid re-traumatisation of survivors.”
Understanding the parameters of HBA
Addressing ‘atypical’ cases of HBA, defined as cases where the survivor is not from a community where HBA is wrongly attributed as a cultural stereotype, or is not female, PhD student at the University of the West of Scotland, Beth Roper, shared that research and campaign work has highlighted abuse in atypical communities including Travellers, Jewish, African, and British communities, and that it also affects men and boys.
She also shared evidence of female perpetration, and how there is a misconception that female perpetrators are always coerced, when most act jointly with men and in a quarter of cases female perpetrators take the lead. This stereotype leads to poor identification by police and other statutory services.
Beth said: “Viewing cases of HBA through a cultural/gender-based lens may mean atypical survivors are dismissed. Given that we know data on stereotypical cases is limited and if we do not have statistics on HBA in atypical cases, how can we confidently say that the prevalence is in stereotypical communities?”
Beth explained how both ‘stereotypical’ and ‘atypical’ HBA is poorly understood and affected by bias. In the case of stereotypical communities, there is both bias to, and reluctance of flagging HBA in stereotypical communities, while ‘race anxiety’ occurs for both ‘stereotypical’ and ‘atypical’ communities, with this poor understanding among professionals acting as barriers to support for survivors and those at risk.
Beth shared that understanding the parameters and characteristics of HBA, outside of a cultural or gender-based lens is pivotal to better identification, discussing HBA in gang culture, where the community is not stereotypical, but contains all the elements of what ‘honour’ is.
Beth explained: “This is where a statutory definition for HBA, like the one proposed by frontline organisations addressing the issue through the #Push4Change campaign, is vital. This definition doesn’t lean into stereotypes and focuses on the act as any form of abuse and the motivation as any perceived shame or perceived divergence from community norms, which means the definition is supportive of atypical cases.”
HBA through a WEIRD lens
The event concluded with a powerful and emotive presentation by Dr Roxanne Khan, based on her new book ‘The Psychology of Honour Abuse, Violence, and Killings’. Looking back on the cases of Victoria Climbie, 25 years ago, the ‘honour’ killings of Shafilea Ahmed and Banaz Mahmod, 22 and 20 years ago respectively, and Sara Sharif, two years ago, Dr Khan asked: ‘Why is it happening, the same story again and again?
The issue, she proposed, was the focus on cultural and not psychological factors, with most psychological studies done by Western academics of European heritage, mainly in the United States
She said: “It’s been developed from a very WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic) perspective, which isn’t representative of the global population – most of the world isn’t WEIRD. When trying to understand HBA cultural factors are overemphasised, and psychosocial factors are overlooked. This means that we are building interventions that simply don’t fit and abusers weaponise stereotypes and assumptions.”
Using the example of the sister of Banaz Mamod, Payzee, being advised by a therapist to write a letter to her father – one of the men who was convicted of her sister’s murder – in prison, Roxanne highlighted the problem of ignoring the distinct elements of HBA, before summarising them.
- Phase 1 – Control (control and shape behaviour)
- Phase 2 – Punish (punish dishonourable behaviour)
- Phase 3 – Blame (protect perpetrator/blame victim)
At the centre of this model are the enforcers who instigate and enable abuse, and the motivation, to protect ‘honour’ and prevent perceived shame. Dr Khan highlighted how the wider community can be forced to support the abuse for fear of themselves being targeted should they refuse.
She referenced coercive control being described as “death by a thousand cuts’ then encouraged attendees to consider what collective coercive control may feel like, explaining that those experiencing HBA suffer three-fold, from the abuse itself, from self-hate and then from WEIRD, racist services that do not meet their needs when seeking help or justice.
Dr Khan ended by imploring attendees to amplify stories of those who have been lost to ‘honour’ and who can’t speak their truth. She said: “I hope this book encourages us to have uncomfortable conversations about the cracks in the system and racism in HBA education and training, and that we keep talking about victims and survivors, in the hope they might know that they are cherished and loved.”
Following a Q&A session with speakers, chaired by Professor Louise Almond, Afrah closed the event by thanking attendees, who were frontline workers, students, teachers and other sector professionals, for attending and taking steps to better understand HBA and harmful practices.
Afrah concluded: “Fifteen years ago, Savera UK was told that these issues were not present here and did not need addressing. Understanding has improved and we have evidence that it does in fact happen here – last year we saw 300 people referred to our service – but there is still a long way to go. It is still groundbreaking to be here talking about this, and it is only by coming together like, committing to learning and taking action that we can bring the change in society, services and government that is needed to end HBA and harmful practices.”